Boise 2026
8773 W Banjo Dr, Boise, ID 83709

8773 W Banjo Dr

8773 W Banjo Dr, Boise, ID 83709 Pending
7/10 clears payment easily (cheap TCA-57 tax); docked for thin ~$13k cash cushion + ~10% over assessed
Parcel R2814140850 · County pulled: 2026-06-10 · Status checked: 2026-07-06
  • Price$399,000
  • Beds / Baths3 / 2
  • Sqft1,200
  • Lot0.14 ac
  • Built2002
  • HOANone
  • Avg drive20 min
  • School zoneWest Ada

Drive times 20 min avg

  • Illya's house 17 min 7.7 mi
  • Jay & Debby's house 28 min 11.7 mi
  • Boise High School 19 min 9.6 mi
  • Idaho Fine Arts Academy 16 min 7.8 mi

Driving estimates via OSRM (free-flow, no traffic) — routes drawn on the map above. Average across 4 landmarks.

Valuation & tax history

YearAssessed valueProperty tax
2026$364,100
2025$369,800$1,308.32
2024$350,100$1,855.60
2023$330,000$1,451.02
2022$387,800$1,682.58
2021$314,200$2,342.70
2020$239,500$1,801.86

Idaho has no cap on assessment increases — assessed value (and therefore tax) drifts up year over year. Budget for the drift.

Run June 10, 2026 · rate 6.55% (Bankrate 6.55% 6/10/2026, Freddie 6.48% 6/4) · cash fund $105k

Listing facts (per Eric)

  • ~$333/sqft
  • Single story (all main floor, no basement/attic) · has A/C · 594 sqft garage · 240 sqft porch · 96 sqft patio (county characteristics)

County record — Ada County Assessor (the truth)

  • List (~$399k) is ~$34,900 / ~9.6% ABOVE the 2026 assessed value of $364,100. A meaningful premium over the county’s market figure — not egregious, but you’re paying ~10% over assessed. Confirm the live list price and ask what justifies it (updates? location within the sub?).

Up ~52% in six years (2020 → 2026); 2022 was a local peak, and 2026 actually ticked down from the 2025 high. Budget for continued tax drift regardless.

Read this carefully — the low bill is real, not a relief trick, but it’s also NOT exemption-adjusted. Tax Code Area 57 runs a notably LOW total levy: 0.003537825 (~0.354%) — roughly a third of the ~0.92% levy in many other Boise areas (e.g. Post St). That low levy is the main reason the bill looks small. The 2025 bill of $1,308.32 = exactly $369,800 (full assessed) × 0.003537825 — meaning the current owner’s bill has NO homeowner’s exemption applied (he may not occupy it as a primary residence, or never filed). The county’s “Taxes Paid” footnote about circuit-breaker / veteran / homeowner’s-relief credits does NOT apply here — Taxes Paid equals Total Taxes exactly, so there’s no hidden relief inflating the gap. Eric as an owner-occupant who files for the homeowner’s exemption would pay LESS than the current owner, not more. (Note the year-to-year bounce — 2021 $2,343 → 2025 $1,308 — driven by levy and assessment swings; budget conservatively.)

Affordability — VERDICT: FITS comfortably (~$2,209/mo, ~$291 under $2,500)

The combination of the low TCA-57 levy and the homeowner’s exemption makes the tax line very low (~$70/mo) — that’s what keeps this house comfortably under target despite the highest price.

20% down (no PMI) — the only structure needed

  • 20% down = $79,800 → loan $319,200
  • P&I at 6.55%: ~$2,028/mo
  • Property tax — Eric’s real bill (exemption applied): assessed $364,100 − $125k homeowner’s exemption = ~$239,100 taxable × 0.003537825 (TCA 57) ≈ ~$846/yr ≈ ~$70/mo. (Even with NO exemption it’s only ~$1,288/yr ≈ ~$107/mo — the levy here is just low.)
  • Insurance: ~$110/mo
  • HOA: $0
  • PMI: $0
  • All-in: ~$2,209/mo → ~$291/mo UNDER $2,500. Clears it. ✓ (Over the old $2,000 target, driven by the $399k price and 6.55% rate, but the cheap tax pulls it back under the current ceiling.)

Cash. $79,800 down + ~$11,970 closing (3%) ≈ $91,770 — inside the $105k fund, but leaving only ~$13.2k of cushion. This is the tightest cash position of the batch (highest list price → biggest down + closing). Workable, but thin; the separate emergency fund stays untouched.

Flags

  • Highest cash-in of the batch (~$92k), thinnest cushion (~$13k left). The $399k list pushes 20% down
    • closing to ~$92k — inside the $105k fund but with the least margin of any candidate. If anything in diligence demands cash (repairs, rate buydown, higher closing), this gets uncomfortable fast.
  • List ~9.6% OVER assessed (~$35k premium). You’re paying ~10% above the county’s market figure. Not a dealbreaker, but the weakest list-vs-assessed gap among the lower-priced candidates — push on why.
  • The tax is genuinely low (TCA 57 ~0.354% levy) AND the current bill is un-exempted. Good news for once: Eric’s filed-exemption bill (~$846/yr) lands below what the current owner pays. Don’t model this house off some other area’s ~0.9% levy — it’s a third of that here.
  • FILE FOR THE HOMEOWNER’S EXEMPTION after closing — not automatic. The current owner doesn’t have it; filing roughly halves the taxable value and takes the bill from ~$1,288/yr to ~$846/yr.
  • Genuine pluses: a 2002 build (newest of the small-house batch — far fewer systems-age worries than the 1939/1974 candidates), full 2 bathrooms, A/C, single-story, no HOA, and a very low property-tax line (~$70/mo).
  • Condition still TBD: at ~1,200 sqft on a small 0.14-ac lot, it’s compact. Inspect normally (roof, HVAC, sewer scope), but a 2002 house is the easy end of the inspection spectrum here.

Bottom line

Fits comfortably and is the best house of the small-home batch — but it’s the most expensive to buy into. At 20% down on ~$399k it runs ~$2,209/mo all-in (~$291 under the $2,500 ceiling), helped a lot by an unusually low Tax Code Area 57 levy (~0.354%) that, with the homeowner’s exemption, drops the tax to ~$846/yr (~$70/mo) — a very low tax line. The catch is cash and price: ~$92k in (highest of the batch) leaves only ~$13.2k of the fund, and the list sits ~9.6% over the $364,100 assessed value. On the flip side, this is a 2002, 3bd / 2ba, ~1,200 sqft single-story — newer and with a second bathroom, so far less systems risk than the 1939 (Post) or 1974 (Valley Heights) candidates. Net: the cleanest house quality and the cheapest carrying cost, paid for with the thinnest cash cushion. If the ~$399k holds, negotiate toward assessed and it’s a strong, low-maintenance pick. FILE FOR THE EXEMPTION.